The tag line for the once popular American television
series, “The X Files,” was “The truth
is out there.” Sadly this is the tag line for life in the Internet age.
I say sadly because the truth is out there somewhere, but no
one can be certain, beyond one’s own interpretation, what exactly constitutes
the truth. Were this simply a scholastic exercise it would be fascinating.
Unfortunately the alarming rate at which the truth is brought to us in
contrasting forms leads inevitably to societal mistrust, distrust, and
dissatisfaction. Individuals, causes, and governments have every opportunity,
thanks to these societal ills and the easy access to the Internet, to guide the
thoughts and feelings of the public.
Reporters covering the February 2014 eruption of violence in
the Ukraine complained that it was very difficult to find the truth because
both sides in the conflict were using modern technology to falsify events. One
reporter said the government ignored or played down unrest during news
broadcasts. Another discovered that a photo ostensibly featuring Ukrainian
protesters linked arm in arm across the landscape in a display of solidarity
had actually been taken during an event in Spain years earlier. It seems the
end justifies the means.
Also disturbing is the increasing trend to cover events
ideologically. Both the left and the right sift through reports from the field,
printing or airing only those that support the outlet’s ideological
underpinnings. With the nation split fairly evenly between conservatives and
liberals this serves to widen the gap between the two sides. For the most part
this leads to hate mail, insinuating tweets, and blogs feeding vitriol to the
choir. But where might this lead?
One television commentator, after watching footage of the conflict
in Kiev, asked the question, “Could this happen here?” Following the Boston
Massacre, Paul Revere created an engraving that historians believe was less
than accurate. His depiction of the event, with British soldiers in formation
apparently under orders to fire into a crowd of civilians, was proof enough for
those in Boston who were already predisposed to believe the worst of the
British. Revere’s engraving, along with accounts by Sam Adams and others,
fomented hostilities between Britain and the colony.
Today’s engravings are photo-shopped images, the accounts
blogs by professed experts and impartial bystanders. The battle is already
being played on the Internet, in the blogosphere, and in the twitterverse.
No comments:
Post a Comment